HarborGrid

Plan marine EV charging networks with deterministic optimization.

Synthetic demonstration data — not for navigation, engineering, permitting, utility interconnection, or investment decisions.

Demonstration networks at 10 nm usable range

Starter network

1 charger

40%

weighted demand coverage

Longest gap: 36.4 nm

Selected sites

  • Ganges

Balanced network

3 chargers

92%

weighted demand coverage

Longest gap: 12.7 nm

Selected sites

  • Friday Harbor
  • Ganges
  • Victoria Harbour

Full demonstration network

5 chargers

100%

weighted demand coverage

Longest gap: 9.8 nm

Selected sites

  • Friday Harbor
  • Ganges
  • Port Angeles
  • Sidney
  • Victoria Harbour

Interactive network map

Move the charger-budget slider to see which synthetic candidate facilities are selected by the deterministic optimizer.

Selected: 3 chargers

Chargers

3

Weighted demand coverage

92%

Longest gap

12.7 nm

Demo confidence

50/100

Demo confidence: 50/100 — fixed because all current source data is synthetic.

Coverage improvement vs 1 charger: 52 percentage points

Longest-gap reduction vs 1 charger: 23.7 nm

Selected sites

  • Friday Harbor
  • Ganges
  • Victoria Harbour

Range circles show straight-line distance and may cross land. They are demonstration proxies, not navigable routes.

Loading map…

Selected sites at 3 chargers

  • Friday Harbor
  • Ganges
  • Victoria Harbour

Before and after

Before

1 charger

40% weighted coverage

Longest gap: 36.4 nm

After

3 chargers

92% weighted coverage

Longest gap: 12.7 nm

Coverage improvement: 52 percentage points

Longest-gap reduction: 23.7 nm

How to read this demonstration

HarborGrid compares candidate charging networks using weighted demand coverage and straight-line nautical-distance proxies. The optimizer—not AI—selects the sites.

The 10 nm usable-range assumption is for demonstration only and is not a certified vessel range.